<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Technology Frontier &#187; satellite tv installation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jadesoft.com/tag/satellite-tv-installation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jadesoft.com</link>
	<description>Visionary Insights since 1995</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 15:47:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dish Network vs AT&amp;T U-verse</title>
		<link>http://www.jadesoft.com/dish-network-vs-att-u-verse/2009/12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jadesoft.com/dish-network-vs-att-u-verse/2009/12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>articlewriter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att uverse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dish network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dish tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite tv installation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uverse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jadesoft.com/dish-network-vs-att-u-verse/2009/12/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are looking for a reliable pay television provider, Dish Network and AT&#38;T are certainly ready to take your money. While Dish Network has been around for years, AT&#38;T U-verse is a service still in its infancy. How do these two companies compare when doing a line by line comparison? With Dish Network, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are looking for a reliable pay television provider, Dish Network and AT&amp;T are certainly ready to take your money. While Dish Network has been around for years, AT&amp;T U-verse is a service still in its infancy. How do these two companies compare when doing a line by line comparison?</p>
<p>With Dish Network, the first thing to check is if you have an unobstructed view of the southern sky, as the installer will need to mount a satellite dish on or near your home for reception. This eliminates access to satellite television for some folks. AT&amp;T U-verse also has service limitations. The telephone company network is being upgraded one area at a time so that this service can reach the homes and apartments of those served by AT&amp;T.</p>
<p>Now if you actually have the option of choosing from either one of these services, here are a few things to keep in mind.</p>
<ul>
<li>Dish Network service usually requires a 24 month service commitment, while U-verse is not currently a service that requires a contract. If you are moving soon, you may want to avoid satellite TV for the time being.</li>
<li>While Dish Network only offers video packages, U-verse offers voice and high speed internet service as well. If you are shopping for a total communications bundles, then signing up with the phone company may be the better option.</li>
<li>When comparing pricing and programming, Dish TV is a little less than U-verse service. For those on a budget these days, going with satellite TV may save you $130 or more per year compared to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dish-television.com/2009/06/26/att-uverse-review/">U-verse bundles</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p> Both companies offer free installation, and you can also find great discounts if you are new to either company. Making a few phone calls to get exact quotes and doing a bit of internet research will insure you make the right choice for you and your family.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jadesoft.com/dish-network-vs-att-u-verse/2009/12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

